🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.